We the Plaintiffs

Preserving our rights to home ownership




Notice of Grievance
'Televised Testimony September 15th, 2017
ON LINE JERICHO MARCH for beach of peace and violation of FAITH
ATTN: Grand Jury Since When is this acceptable?
IMG_7811IMG_7810IMG_7812

This is a documentation request for a reconsideration of the Federal Case showing the State courts vested interest holding
documented real estate transactions being conducted through the courts in exchange for judicial favors.


complaint

Forwarded message:
From: Faith Brashear
To: Yolanda_Skipper@cacd.uscourts.gov
Date: Friday, July 14, 2017 at 12:09:39 PM
Subject: Re: Activity in Case 2:16-cv-02360-TJH-KK Faith Lynn Brashear v. The Morgage Law Firm PLC et al Order on Motion for Reconsideration

Mrs Skipper that was the number provided to me by your clerks office, if your office errored in conveying this information, that is not my fault. The entire complaint is based upon the most recent federal case by Mrs Patricia Rodriguez at the Rodriguez law group.

We held conversations specifically stating it was for the most recent - and frankly your intake person, took it in BASED upon the most recent law suit. So you will need to explain yourselves.

This motion to compel makes reference to the 2015 case as direct volunteer federal witness testimony and to the recent federal case upon its first pages - stating rulings made in 2017.

This is now called obstruction of justice unless you correct it. Let me summarize the gravity of the situation your courts are in.

So to elaborate on what I was doing at the Riverside Sheriffs office yesterday (at epicenter of crime central) and what a fellow advocate are currently doing at the San Bernardino, Menifee and Orange County Sheriffs office and the Orange County DA today and next week.

The reconsideration motion which caused an internal reclusal of a 3rd generation judge.. reopened my initial case in federal where I seriously break down in cross laymen / attorney banter how the contract/collatorilization/trading portion of the MERS system works.

So fun statement of facts to mention.. Prior to this case I opened an ongoing crime report to the Corona Police Department Report no: 36440 - So what I served the sheriff was everything I have been posting about on my online peaceful protest which is now reaching Florida.

Now I warned the sheriff directly that if he served me a Civil Notice (Under CCP 262 in matters of criminal nature the Sheriffs hold no duty to interfere - meaning they had no business serving me an order to vacate under a civil matter thus the claim upon the sheriffs department) it means I can file a direct claim for damages against the sherifs office for violating their County Charter which is why I filed claim for damages against the clerk of the board of Supervisors and gave “fair warning” and submitted a request for the sheriff to investigate these CIVIL RICO matters… What the Sheriff will see in what I served to them is this…

I submitted my initial Federal Complaint "JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DEBTOR COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. Sec 1983 FALSE CLAIMS 31 U.S. Code § 3729 (a) (C), violations of US Constitutional Amendments, 5th, 8th 9th and 14th. Adversary Trial for Summary Judgment, Declaratory and Injunctive relief.”

1. Preliminary Injunction and OSC re (Rule 65(b)(1)(A)&(B) Rule 65(d)et seq; in re: U.S.C., Title 15, §79r(f) and §2924.12); (CCP §525-529; §2924.12); 2. CANCELLATION and EXPUNGEMENT of Void Instruments on Plaintiff’s Land Record as CLOUDs on Title;
3. DECLARATORY RELIEF (Judicial determination that the “Assignments of Deed of Trusts” are Void Instruments) In re: Jesinoski and Yvanova Supreme court rulings. 4. DECLARATORY RELIEF Judicial determination that the rulings at Superior Court are VOID ab initio re: Misconduct. CCP Section 52.1 – Witness Tampering. 5. Rescission under Truth in Lending Act; Damages for Statutory Violations in re: Civil Code Sections: 2923.55, 2923.7, 2924.9, 2924.10, and 2924.17.6.Compliance under Truth in Lending Act, et al. 130 [15 U.S.C., 1640], and
26 U.S.

That made me an informant. I re-asserted my 2009 volunteer witness status which makes it difficult to debunk my volunteer work so therefor this is 18 U.S. Code § 1512 – I have them REPEATEDLY Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. Now because I am also considered disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Title 42 of the United States Code is the United States Code dealing with public health, social welfare, and civil rights.
42 U.S. Code § 12202 - State immunity

A State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the United States from an action in [1] Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a violation of this chapter. In any action against a State for a violation of the requirements of this chapter, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in an action against any public or private entity other than a State. (Pub. L. 101–336, title V, § 502, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 370 )

42 U.S. Code § 12203 - Prohibition against retaliation and coercion
(a) Retaliation
No person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this chapter.
(b) Interference, coercion, or intimidation
It shall be unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by this chapter.
(c) Remedies and procedures
The remedies and procedures available under sections 12117, 12133, and 12188 of this title shall be available to aggrieved persons for violations of subsections (a) and (b), with respect to subchapter I, subchapter II and subchapter III, respectively.
(Pub. L. 101–336, title V, § 503, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 370.)

So when the UD judge (the one who set a Jury Trial - where a juror approached my witness and she slapped my witness' testimony - when I exposed their witness was conducting real estate transaction with the head justice vested interest in his CA 700 Real Estate company lost my attorney then re-set the Jury Trail allowed a 7 day summary judgment that I did not officially get until the day after I could respond -14 min days required and moved it above my summary judgement - I was pulled into a summary judgment one day before jury- The same judge whom recognized there were triable issues, whom issued a mistrial and rescheduled the jury trial just ruled no triable issues not contested. Surreal, and yes contested not authenticated, missing lease required under 1166 and Missing Majority Action Affidavit CA Civil Code 2941.9. Failure to perfect under 2924 ((h)(c) beyond 15 days upon an accommodation stamp lacking relevance and foundation) and refused to continue to allow me an ADA advocate)

BTW https://californialawblog.wordpress.com/…/the-75-day-notic…/

When that judge refused to take her own oath of office by stating she "did not have to do that" in my religious beliefs, she made empty the lords name.... because I am a woman who legal changed her name to Faith as a soul choice under such extreme circumstances that I had to endure- Acts of God - storms declared federal disasters destroying our WA home - Elder abuse of my father (military) who later died and his S/O found dead "accidentally swallowing her tongue- husband deemed inoperable cancer (now full remission) and being dragged into forced then volunteer federal witness of ongoing mortgage crime-, that means that my NAME “IS” a symbol of public faith or at least the promise thereof. These courts violated my name and my spiritual beliefs under the 10 commandments - do not take the Lords name in vein - do not steal - and do not bear false testimony. (Real Estate appraisal /broker against a NAR Broker / Advocate/ past NAR Litigation Liaison holding appraisal training in both RBPO and NIAOP (residential and commercial) as a student of contract law whom has reviewed the entire IRS code book whom was a beta tester of their MERS underwriting system whom also was granted privilege to broker "mortgage" to a multitude of sub-prime and wholesale lenders.

1) Law Enforcement Code of Ethics specifically states “As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice…… I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service.”
H.R.2802 .

2) The Honorable Irma Pool Ashberry has violated my religious beliefs by the denouncing of her oaths under 28 U.S. Code § 453 – “So help me God.” These courts have made empty the very name under which Defendant name stands.

The State ruling violates Defendants name Faith and SPIRITUAL FAITH. H.R.2802 - First Amendment Defense Act - Prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction - not to mention that holding this knowledge was an incredible burden to bear because in my knowledge I actually know how to take down this “system” which could create economic melt down- endured forced Moral Turpitude which is one heck of an ANTI-SLAPP law suit against the league of Charters.

I have lost 4 properties 2 wrongful foreclosures in the State of WA declared as such (one by a national settlement so they could pay $800 to the consumer in exchange for a back door Fannie Mae 911 subsidy depreciation write off of the value of the home as the original lender). Yeah go that evidence too... 1 short sale in CA and this current home by fraud -spoilage - collusion and misuse of sheriffs force is the poster child of how rouge these courts have become. .

Good luck - I gave these banksters more than enough fair warning, all documented by various government agencies including CFPB Department of Business Oversight - SEC fraud - FINCIN - TIGTA IRS fraud.... and so on and so forth…

So I am happy to move this to a Title 42 for obstruction of justice.

You let me know what you wish to do… Because TILA is not time barred - nor is retaliation against a federal witness which you are now engaging in.

Now the new attorney firm whom will be with you shortly is very well funded and just as strong as these class action kids. Attached are the notices that have been going out to varies federal agencies. As I understand it August is coming up pretty quick - I am sure Dunn and Bradstreet would be interest to know that the league of charters might have a law suit against it in short order.

So by this very deep pocket Georgia support to the top criminal law firm in the Nation who just downed a $40 MIL suit to whom has agreed to take this case - just know she does not settle.

Good luck

Faith Brashear
BRE#00967603

(951) 268-4042


On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Yolanda_Skipper@cacd.uscourts.gov (mailto:Yolanda_Skipper@cacd.uscourts.gov) wrote:

Ms. Brashear, this is the case number you provided and filed for this motion with case number CV 16-2360-TJH on your pleadings.


If there is a different motion please provide me the case number of which you are speaking of. Thank you.


Yolanda Skipper, Courtroom Deputy Clerk to the
Hon. Terry J. Hatter, Jr., United States District Judge
Telephone: (213) 894-5276 AND
Courtroom Deputy Clerk to the
Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall, United States District Judge
Telephone: (213) 894-5288





From: Faith Brashear
To: Yolanda_Skipper@cacd.uscourts.gov (mailto:Yolanda_Skipper@cacd.uscourts.gov)
Date: 07/14/2017 11:47 AM
Subject: Fwd: Activity in Case 2:16-cv-02360-TJH-KK Faith Lynn Brashear v. The Morgage Law Firm PLC et al Order on Motion for Reconsideration



It would appear that you placed this motion on an older case and not the recent case we were discussing.

Please explain why the federal courts are attempting to bury this case.

Begin forwarded message:

From: cacd_ecfmail@cacd.uscourts.gov (mailto:cacd_ecfmail@cacd.uscourts.gov)
Date: July 14, 2017 at 11:35:31 AM PDT
To: ecfnef@cacd.uscourts.gov (mailto:ecfnef@cacd.uscourts.gov)
Subject: Activity in Case 2:16-cv-02360-TJH-KK Faith Lynn Brashear v. The Morgage Law Firm PLC et al Order on Motion for Reconsideration
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 7/14/2017 at 11:35 AM PDT and filed on 7/14/2017
Case Name:
Faith Lynn Brashear v. The Morgage Law Firm PLC et al

Case Number:
2:16-cv-02360-TJH-KK (https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?644720)

Filer:


WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 07/05/2016

Document Number:
92 (https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/doc1/031126230248?caseid=644720&de_seq_num=245&magic_num=49696136&pdf_toggle_possible=1)






Docket Text:
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. (stated on pages 1-3 of Motion for Reconsideration, Interlocutory Order and Brief in Support [90]) is DENIED. (cw)

2:16-cv-02360-TJH-KK Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Jed P White jed.white@bryancave.com (mailto:jed.white@bryancave.com), christine.kehlenbeck@bryancave.com (mailto:christine.kehlenbeck@bryancave.com)

Sarah Burwick sarah.burwick@bryancave.com (mailto:sarah.burwick@bryancave.com), sarah.samuelson@bryancave.com (mailto:sarah.samuelson@bryancave.com), raul.morales@bryancave.com (mailto:raul.morales@bryancave.com)

James F Lewin jimlewin7@gmail.com (mailto:jimlewin7@gmail.com), james.lewin@mtglawfirm.com (mailto:james.lewin@mtglawfirm.com)

Faith Lynn Brashear faith@betterquest.com (mailto:faith@betterquest.com)

2:16-cv-02360-TJH-KK Notice has been delivered by First Class U. S. Mail or by other means BY THE FILER to :


Attachments:
- CV 16-2360-BRASHEAR V SPECIALEZ DOCKET NO. 90.pdf




complaint

Exhibit_1

Exhibit_2

Exhibit_3

Exhibit_4

Exhibit_5

Ex 6

Ex 7

Because We the Pro Se did not get the 2011 "Memo"

Please Provide Executive Order to Deprive Due Process

DISCUSSION BEFORE CONGRESS - THE SUPREME COURT - THE DOJ DIVISION OF THE AMERICAN FOR DISABILITIES - THE AMIRICAN BAR ASSOCIATION- THE CALIFORNIA STATE COURTS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY - THE FEDERAL COURTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTRY - THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - THE COMMISSION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS.


It was conveyed to declarant and witnessed as such that the courts were under orders to prevent homeowners from "breaking through "the judicial system.

QUESTION #1
Under who's orders from above to deprive homeowners their constitutionally protected due process rights, in turn enabling Civil Racketeering to be filtered through the Head Justice Judge Daniel A Ottolia vested ownership interest in First Team Real Estate in exchange for judicial favors in the form of REO transfers by members of the federalized banking industry where his wife Liz Ottolia hangs her real estate license.

IN RE: Photos of Faith Lynn Brashear battered and bruised head to toe - video of Faith Lynn Brashear's guide dog September 2017 still limping and must now be retired.

In RE: specific REO transaction conducted by the Superior Courts Head Justice and two Witness's outlining the fabrication/ spoilage of evidence and false testimony conducted at the Historical Riverside Court specifically transferred to that court from the Moreno Valley Unlawful Detainer courts by the Head Justice Daniel Otellia.

In RE: Excel list of over 3000 REO properties filtered through First Team Real Estate since 2012 - When the head justice Daniel Otellia filed his California 700 form showing 10% ownership interest in First Team Real Estate listing his wife Liz Otellia as the commission source of his vested interest in said company.


THIS IS A LIVE TELIVISED DEMAND FOR THE FOLLOWING:

Please provide the executive order which was issued to use whatever means necessary to deprive homeowners their constitutional rights to due process of law in over 30 cities up and down the California Coast including but not limited to 29 DBA’s and 36 franchise offices located in various cities: Anaheim, Arroyo Grande, Bakersfield, Beverly Hills, Big Bear, Cathedral City, Corona, Fullerton, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Ladera Ranch, Laguna Beach, Laguna Niguel, Long Beach, Palm Desert, Oceanside, Marina Del Ray, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, Pasadena, Palm Springs, San Clemente, San Diego, Seal Beach, Sunset Beach, Temecula, Tustin, Yorba Linda, Valencia, and Westlake.


f211

Letter to Chiang_Treasurer_Brashear
EPSON005

005IRS REVENUE Lack of JURISDICTION, DOA Do Not Consent LTR 2 ATTY .vA1

- 72-HR DEMAND FOR DOA