We the Plaintiffs

Preserving our rights to home ownership



Notice of Grievance
'Televised Testimony September 15th, 2017
ON LINE JERICHO MARCH for beach of peace and violation of FAITH
REQUEST FOR NOTICE UNDER CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 2924b
Majority Action Affidavit
Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code. Non-compliant check [ ] Yes [ ] No.

In re: NOTICE TO CREDITOR EXHIBIT B: Please provide the following:

NOTICE RECORDED IN COURT

The undersigned Trustee _______________________, states: Beneficiary(s) were authorized, pursuant to Civil Code Section 2941.9 and by Agreement to Be Governed by Majority Interest Holders, showing 51% interest, prior to Notice of Default and foreclosure, pursuant governed by Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code. Provide name of originator and NMLS registration number ___________________________________________.

[1. Specify other title of agreement] __________________ dated: __/__/__ to act on behalf of [specify, e.g., all of the holders of several notes that are in favor of different payees but that are secured by a single Deed of Trust dated ___/____/___, executed by: __________________ and ________________(name) Trustor, that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. was designated as the original beneficiary, during years of registration with the CA Secretary of State at the time the Deed of Trust was procured [ ] YES - [ ] NO (specify) names of Beneficiaries holding 51%: or more.
Name of original Trustee: __________________________ assigned to the above Deed of Trust and (person and company) that substituted a new trustee, if different than the original lender: _____________________________________ (
name) as Trustee, and recorded __________ (date), as Instrument No. __________ in Book __________, Page _______, Official Records of ______________________________________ County, California].
The following action [has been2. or will be] taken by the undersigned pursuant to the authority granted in Civil Code Section 2941.9 (d). *Please attach Notary Acknowledgement.
Reporting to Franchise Tax Board – Federal Employer I.D. Number and Social Security Number 30. You are hereby required to furnish Internal Revenue Code Form 8594, as reported to the IRS.
(a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, any board, as defined in Section 22, and the State Bar and the Bureau of Real Estate shall, at the time of issuance of the license, require that the applicant provide its federal employer identification number, if the applicant is a partnership, or the applicant’s social security number for all other applicants. (2) No later than January 1, 2016, in accordance with Section 135.5, a board, as defined in Section 22, and the State Bar and the Bureau of Real Estate shall require either the individual taxpayer identification number or social security number if the applicant is an individual for purposes of this subdivision.
(b) A licensee failing to provide the federal employer identification number, or the individual taxpayer identification number or social security number shall be reported by the licensing board to the Franchise Tax Board. If the licensee fails to provide that information after notification pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 19528 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the licensee shall be subject to the penalty provided in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 19528 of the Revenue and Taxation Code.

Senate Bill No. 1638 CHAPTER 839

An act to amend Section 2934a of, and to add Section 2941.9 to, the Civil Code, relating to trust deeds. [Approved by Governor September 22, 1996. Filed with Secretary of State September 24, 1996.]

Deeds of trust: trustee substitution. Existing law sets forth the procedures for the substitution of trustees under a deed of trust upon real property or an estate for years therein. This bill would, as an alternative procedure, set forth the procedures for the substitution of trustees under a deed of trust upon real property or an estate for years, given to secure an obligation to pay money, by the beneficiary or beneficiaries under the trust deed who hold more than 50% of the record beneficial interest of a series of notes secured by the same real property or of undivided interests in a note secured by real property equivalent to a series transaction. The bill would also establish a process through which all of the beneficiaries under a trust deed can agree to be governed by beneficiaries holding more than 50% of the record beneficial interest of a series of notes in real property or interests in a note equivalent to a series transaction, as specified. In order to substitute trustees or agree to be governed by the majority interest holders, all parties to the transaction would be required to sign and record a document containing specified information.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 2934a of the Civil Code, as amended by Section 1.5 of Chapter 754 of the Statutes of 1993, is amended to read: 2934a. (a) (1) The trustee under a trust deed upon real property or an estate for years therein given to secure an obligation to pay money and conferring no other duties upon the trustee than those which are incidental to the exercise of the power of sale therein conferred, may be substituted by the recording in the county in which the property is located of a substitution executed and acknowledged by:


    (D) Notice of the substitution was sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, with return receipt requested to each holder of an interest in the obligation secured by the deed of trust who has not joined in the execution of the substitution or the separate document.

    The separate document shall be attached to the substitution and be recorded in the office of the county recorder of each county in which the real property described in the deed of trust is located. Once the document required by this paragraph is recorded, it shall constitute conclusive evidence of compliance with the requirements of this paragraph in favor of substituted trustees acting pursuant to this section, subsequent assignees of the obligation secured by the deed of trust, and subsequent bona fide purchasers or encumbrancers for value of the real property described therein.

    FORECLOSING TRUSTEE TO FURTHER PROVIDE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER AND PERSONAL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER


    PUBLIC/LEGAL NOTICE of DEFECTIVE TITLE


    FAITH LYNN BRASHEAR
    1106 West 56th Street
    Los Angeles CA 90037

    Notice of Defective Title. Reference is made to that certain deed made by Faith Lynn Brashear as Grantor to Countrywide Bank FSB c/o HSBC as trustee, in favor of The Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-OA4 as Beneficiary, (Recording Date: 5/14/2007 as Instrument No as Docket No. 2007-0319880 Dated: 5/2/2007) in official records of Riverside County, California, for the following described real property situated in Riverside County, California, described as APN: 116-290-047 the .84 ACRES, M/L In LOT 47 Mb 365/084 Tr 29617 commonly known as 1095 LOWRY RANCH ROAD, CORONA, Ca, 92881,

    The undersigned hereby certifies legal and factual proof of DEFECTIVE TITLE evidenced by the following fraudulent, forged and recorded documents by unknown third parties in each of the following recorded documents:

    Any questions regarding this matter should be direct to Faith Lynn Brashear, a direct source federal witness of mortgage crimes in the Inland Empire.

    The following perpetrators (Incidental Beneficiaries) pretended to represent the Lender of Record/Creditor named herein the “Deed of Trust” The Security Contract Signed off between Trustor Faith Lynn Brashear FKA Donna Marie Beltz and Countrywide Bank FSB, the originator for The Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-OA4 (Recording Date: 5/14/2007 as Instrument No as Docket No. 2007-0319880 Dated: 5/2/2007) through whom HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for the Holders of The Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-OA4 engaged in the Defalcation of the trust and enacted a non-judicial foreclosure as the original undisclosed holder in due course without a majority action affidavit required BY LAW under 2941.9(d) PRIOR to the issuance of a NOD or NTS as the first sentence in 2924 specifically states that anything OTHER THAN A TRUST is considered a mortgage under CALIFORNA STATE LAW.

    March 2007 Countrywide Bank FSB changed primary regulatory agency from COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY to OFFICE OF TTHRIFT SUPERVISION. THERE IS NO RECORD SHOWING COUNTRYWIDE BANK FSB “COMPLIED” WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & OVERSIGHT UNDER LENDING LICENSE NUMBER 00351782 notate as Countrywide Home Loans /affiliate licenses under Countrywide DBA's or under its foreign stock C0568549.

    NO LENDING LICENSE CAN BE FOUND UNDER COUNTRYWIDE BANK FSB IN EITHER CA OR VA in which Countrywide Bank FSB forfeited their banking status in 3/2007. The wholesale Broker Agreement between Countrywide Home Loans Inc, a New York Corporation and Faith Lynn Brashear through which a refinance was allegedly brokered, holds no mention of Countrywide Bank FSB.



    LICENSE STATUS: - NON-EXISTANT - Countrywide Bank FSB "the bank" officially went Inactive as of 4-27-2009. LICENSE TYPE RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LENDER CANNOT BE FOUND- ADDRESS: 1199 NORTH FAIRFAX STREET STE. 500, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314. Countrywide Bank FSB - Moved bank headquarters from Alexandria, CA to Centennial, CO. February 17, 2009, Countrywide Bank, FSB, Centennial, Colorado (“Countrywide” or “Countrywide FSB”), filed an application to convert to a national bank charter to be titled Countrywide Bank, National Association (“BANA-Colorado”), also with its main office in Centennial, Colorado. On the same day, Bank of America, National Association, Charlotte, North Carolina (“BANA”) filed an application to acquire BANA-Colorado by merger. Countrywide Bank FSB has branches in two states, Texas and Virginia, but did not seek to retain those branches following the conversion. Countrywide Bank FSB was never registered with the secretary of state, never licensed to do business in the state of CA, had their banking status revoked in 3/2007 and did not seek to retain their Bank branches. No Corporate Assignment of Deed exists between Countrywide Bank FSB and Bank of America.

    HSBC has failed to comply with contractual terms of the Deed of Trust, failed to prove that The Mortgage LAW Firm was in fact the legal trustee and thus is not in accordance with Civl Code §2924, and failed to show it "perfected title", as on the face of the record, it is an illegal Trustee Sale the same as in
    Dimock v. Emerald Properties (2000) 81 Cal.App. 4th 868 [97 Cal.Rptr.Zd 25 5J which was followed in Lona v. Citibank, NA. (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 89 in finding that tender is not required when the sale is based on legal issues (fraud, illegal trustee), rather than equitable issues. Further a fraudulent Deed of Trust was electronically recorded upon title under DOC#2016-037198beyond the 15 days allotted under 2924 (h)(c) which according to the Supreme Court ruling U.S. FINANCIAL, L.P. as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL MCLITUS, voids this sale. The 1099-A issued by Specialized Loan Servicing (SLS) as the Original Lender who lent Donna Beltz notated the abandonment on 8/11/16 prior to the non-perfected within 15 days under 2924(h)(c) Trustee Deed upon sale. HSBC recorded with a Stamp “This instrument is being recorded as an ACCOMODATION ONLY, with no Representation to its effect upon title” on 8/29/2016.

    The recordation of a Trustee Deed upon Sale Doc# recordation’s was conducted by Service Link Irvine. The only company registered with the Secretary of State was ServiceLink, Inc. whom in fact filed a Certificate of Surrender of Right to Transact Intrastate Business signed off by Christopher F. Azure, President and Chief Executive Officer Filed by the California Secretary of State November 22nd 2013 #3522085. HSBC has committed wire transfer fraud.



    THERE IS NO RECORD THAT COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB. COMPLIED WITH THE CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE AND SINCE THEN THERE IS NO RECORD OF ANY DATED SIGNED MERGER
    Certificate of Merger (Form OBE MERGER-1) Pursuant to the Statutory filing provisions are found in California Corporations Code sections 1113(g), 3203(g), 6019.1, 8019.1, 9640, 12540.1, 15911.14, 16915(b) and 17710.14

    All statutory references are to the California Corporations Code, unless otherwise indicated. Note: If a limited partnership is a party to the merger, signing the Certificate of Merger (Form OBE MERGER-1) constitutes an affirmation under penalty of perjury that the facts stated in the document are true. (Section 15902.08(b).) The Certificate of Merger (Form OBE MERGER-1) may be used for mergers between: (1) limited liability companies only, in which a one or more California limited liability companies are a party to the merger; (2) limited partnerships only, in which one or more California limited partnerships are a party to the merger; or (3) other business entities (i.e., interspecies mergers), in which one or more California corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnerships or partnerships are a party to the merger

    [The term “other business entity” is defined in Sections 174.5, 5063.5, 12242.5, 15911.01(k), 16901(12) and 17710.01(k).]It is recommended that legal counsel be consulted prior to submitting the Certificate of Merger (Form OBE MERGER-1) to ensure that all issues are appropriately addressed. OR SIGNED off by (COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB (ORIGINATOR)) RECORDED a DECLARATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 2924(h); the following recorded instruments was not authorizing within the Statute of Limitations-California-Law pursuant to CCP §337(1), CCP§337(2), Commercial Code §3118(a) - (b) 

    These recorded instruments recorded in the County of Riverside by HSBC for the Property located at 1095 Lowry Ranch Road, Corona CA 92881. Real Property Legal description: The .84 Acres M/L In Lot 47 Mb 365/084 Tr 29617 occurred after Statute of Limitations-California-Law pursuant to CCP §337(1), CCP§337(2), Commercial Code §3118(a) - (b) 

    In re: Defective Recordings

    WHEREAS, The MERS Member Identification number referenced herein as MIN NO: 1001337-0002108190-9 documents the MERS member 1001337 as Countrywide Bank, FSB and further documents an unidentified pass-through loan number 0002108190 tendering loan number 00016536826405007 as recorded on DOC # 2007-0319880. Recession was exercised under 2941 sub (b)(1)(A-C) upon discovery of the un-securitized instrument and additional verification of its lack of legality upon inception.

    WHEREAS, The nunc pro tunc loans acceleration date is clearly outlined in the first HSBC / Recon Trust Notice of Default which identified the loans DUE DATE aka acceleration date as 6/1/2008. Doc 2012-0129568 3/20/12,. U.C.C. - ARTICLE 3 - NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS (2002) § 3-118. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. (a) Except as provided in subsection (e), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time must be commenced within six years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated by a trustee in trust, within six years after the accelerated due date. No legal standing to foreclose exists making the recording of a Notice of Trustee Sale, in violation of PENAL CODE SECTIONS 470-483.5

    WHEREAS CC 2923.5 Claim Unavailable if Servicer Rescinds NOD Doc#2014-0188942. Thereby nullifying Doc#2014-0488544.

    WHEREAS, under TILA1635 (f) (3) consummation never took place thereby extinguishing the seven-year ACKNOWLEGED AS rescinded in 2009 instrument by OPERATION OF FEDERAL LAW. Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc 729 F. 3d 1092 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, 2013 LAW OF THE LAND RULING. Matter of State Law. 12 C.F.R. pt. 226,. 2(a)(13).

    WHEREAS Bank of America prepared an assignment of Deed with a known robo signer acting on behalf of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. recorded DOC#2011-0411709 with “all beneficial interests” and NO “for value consideration” as the loan was not attached ie no value. A legal beneficiary would have transferred an abandoned Deed the security trust, however this transfer evidences a transfer to Bank of America the “servicer” with “ALL beneficiary interest” thereby transferring to Bank of America prepared by Bank of America naming themselves as the new Beneficiary under a regular Deed of Trust transfer with no “For Valuable Consideration”. Bank of America, the “servicer” altered a Corporation Assignment of Deed of Trust/Mortgage and recorded a Corporation Deed Transfer to HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for the “Holders” of the Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-though Certificates Series 2007-OA4. Doc# 2012-0129567. A “Holder” is not a “Trust”. No “Actual” transfer into above trust exists. It is not only beyond the 90 day pooling and servicing agreements of a legitimate security trust to be able to do so, said was terminated/suspended swapped out in 2008 rendering it nunc pro tunc, extinguished null and void to the point where it can no longer be placed into the trust extinguishing all beneficiary interests to the trust. Cheung v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 987 F. Supp. 2d 972 (N.D. Cal. 2013). Further Said Trust was utilized for the purpose of issuing pass through certificates attached to the manipulated LIBOR Index evidenced at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm on the trusts recorded prospectus. “Contains 2007-0A4 enter”. Therefor said trust became the property of unknown “holders” having non-claimable beneficiary “desires of interest”. These recorded Documents evidencing these events, renders any sale action against this property void therefore tender is no longer required. Aniel v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 550 F. App’x 416 (9th Cir. 2013), Engler v. ReconTrust Co., 2013 WL 6815013 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2013) CC § 2934a(a)(1)

    Making ALL NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND ELECTION TO SELL UNDER DEED OF TRUST issued through the MERS "system" assigned Debt Collector AKA The Mortgage Law Firm Blatantly Misrepresenting a fiduciary relationship with disclosed lender/creditor (COUNTRYWIDE BANK FSB whom changed primary regulatory agency from COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY to OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION which means that COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB COULD NOT ACT IN THE CAPACITY OF A BANK LENDER ON 5/2/2007. TURNING DOC #2007-0319880 CONTRACT INTO FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT AND FRAUD IN FACTUM.


    Compare the Verbiage between Defendants Ex. A pg3 -DOC#
    2012-0129568 – Notice of Default NOTE: verbiage “will become due on 6/1/2037 as a result of the maturity of the obligation.” to Defendants Ex C pg3 2014 NOD DOC# 2014-0488544 – Notice of Default removing the aforementioned verbiage “will become due on 6/1/2037” and replacing the amount with $660,602 as a 12-month INSTALLMENT loan that became due on Sunday June 1st 2008.

    Now Compare Ex. G 2009 TILA rescission and forensic audit which states
    “The ‘Finance Charge” and “The Total of Payments” are deceptively and fraudulently understated by $662,502.47”. The 2014 NOD, Ex C DOC# 2014-0488544 – Notice of Default replacing the amount with $660,602 as an INSTALLMENT loan that became due on June 1st 2008. This is 98.99% accuracy prediction of the 2009 undisclosed interest charges compared to the installment loan notated upon the Notice of Default. Under REG X – RESPA this was derived utilizing the disclosed amortization tables associated with these loans and comparing it to the projected interest rates being reflected upon the payment coupons. It is enough to establish probable cause that triggering devises and timing machoism’s existed upon these contracts.

    Furthermore, Certificate Holders were told that their investments would be secured by deeds of trust.
    In actuality, the trust deeds were fraudulent because they held toxic tort violations and conflicts of state and federal law, therefore, did not secure the investments. Certificate holders only hold undivided interest in regular interest payments as further outlined in the SEC filings of the 8k report holding Kennedy Clauses specifically preventing certificate holders from being Holders in Due course.

    Federal Rule Of Evidence 803(10) As Amended December 1, 2013 strike out indicates deletion. Compare Doc#2011- 0411709 - First
    “Assignment of Deed of Trust”. to Doc#2012-0129567 – Second “CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF DEED OF TRUST/ MORTGAGE” , Ex E Note that no Corporation Assignment of Deed of Trust exists from Countrywide, the word mortgage is struck, and the no direct transfer into the actual trust exists, only a transfer to HSBC.

    Both the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, signed by President Bush, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, signed by President Obama, instituted a 50% bonus depreciation allowance. Later, the Tax Relief, Unemployment Compensation Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 further increased the allowance to 100% – such that the asset would be fully depreciated in the year of acquisition. This meant that that the lending industry was allowed to buy a worthless sub prime loans and get a 100 percent tax credit by cancelling it, Day one under 26 US Code Section 61 (a) (1) Cancellation of debt and conversion to income paid on a tax payer form 1099.
    See USA v Deutsche Bank AG et al in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 11-02976. The $202.3 million resolves damages and penalties under the False Claims Act.

    A 1099-A is issued for NON-ORDINARY consideration under US 26 section 61 (a) (1) and sec 108 (i) paid post sale – it is not one in the same with interest earned by a lender and paid by a debtor. These issues fall under section 1.1031 where the banks are swapping out depreciation write offs under an alleged partnership interests or "interests on like property exchanges." This miscues the intent under Kirby vs US Lumber to the point where the consumer suffers economic loss as NO MORTGAGE was ever recorded against the property. Only an undisclosed Corporate ENTITY BORROWER (designated by all caps) covenanting that the consumer borrower was lawfully seised from a free and clear property and that this use of the property was irrevocably granted into TRUST. Deeds of conveyance for use of property to which a entitly BORROWS money OVER the consumer by use of their signature is called a Warranty deed of conveyance. Warranty Deeds create Abstracts which cannot be perfected, they are by grant or treaty which VIOLATES Congressional intent. See WINEMAN v. GASTRELL 53 F. 697 Dec 12, 1892.

    Making ANY ruling at a UD Court VOID per operation of law.

    Declaration of Faith Lynn Brashear

    Initial Federal Complaint "JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DEBTOR COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. Sec 1983 FALSE CLAIMS 31 U.S. Code § 3729 (a) (C), violations of US Constitutional Amendments, 5th, 8th 9th and 14th. Adversary Trial for Summary Judgment, Declaratory and Injunctive relief.” Requesting Preliminary Injunction and OSC re (Rule 65(b)(1)(A)&(B) Rule 65(d)et seq; in re: U.S.C., Title 15, §79r(f) and §2924.12); (CCP §525-529; §2924.12); 2. CANCELLATION and EXPUNGEMENT of Void Instruments on Plaintiff’s Land Record as CLOUDs on Title;

    I, Faith Lynn Brashear was DENIED DECLARATORY RELIEF (Judicial determination that the “Assignments of Deed of Trusts” are Void Instruments) In re: Jesinoski and Yvanova Supreme court rulings. 4. DECLARATORY RELIEF Judicial determination that the rulings at Superior Court are VOID ab initio re: Misconduct. CCP Section 52.1 – Witness Tampering. 5. Rescission under Truth in Lending Act; Damages for Statutory Violations in re: Civil Code Sections: 2923.55, 2923.7, 2924.9, 2924.10, and 2924.17.6.Compliance under Truth in Lending Act, et al. 130 [15 U.S.C., 1640], and 26 U.S.

    I am a federal informant who re-asserted her 2009 volunteer witness status which makes it difficult to debunk ANY volunteer work so therefore these actions now fall under 18 U.S. Code § 1512 –REPEATEDLY Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. HSBC brought forth a law suit under a terminated REMIC which held Countrywide (past employeer) Wells Fargo (past beta tester for the UD underwriting system) and Bank of America - successor of servicing rights of MORTGAGES ONLY.

    I am also considered disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act. This makes HSBC in violation of

    #1) Title 42 of the United States Code is the United States Code dealing with public health, social welfare, and civil rights.
    42 U.S. Code § 12202 - State immunity

    A State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the United States from an action in [1] Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a violation of this chapter. In any action against a State for a violation of the requirements of this chapter, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in an action against any public or private entity other than a State. (Pub. L. 101–336, title V, § 502, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 370 )

    #2) 42 U.S. Code § 12203 - Prohibition against retaliation and coercion
    (a) Retaliation
    No person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this chapter.
    (b) Interference, coercion, or intimidation
    It shall be unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by this chapter.
    (c) Remedies and proceduresThe remedies and procedures available under sections 12117, 12133, and 12188 of this title shall be available to aggrieved persons for violations of subsections (a) and (b), with respect to subchapter I, subchapter II and subchapter III, respectively.(Pub. L. 101–336, title V, § 503, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 370.)

    When the UD judge (the one who set a Jury Trial - where a juror approached my witness and she slapped my witness' testimony - when I exposed their witness was conducting real estate transaction with the head justice vested interest in his CA 700 Real Estate company lost my attorney then re-set the Jury Trail allowed a 7 day summary judgment that I did not officially get until the day after I could respond -14 min days required and moved it above my summary judgement - I was pulled into a summary judgment one day before jury- The same judge whom recognized there were triable issues, whom issued a mistrial and rescheduled the jury trial just ruled no triable issues not contested. Surreal, and yes contested not authenticated, missing lease required under 1166 and Missing Majority Action Affidavit CA Civil Code 2941.9. Failure to perfect under 2924 ((h)(c) beyond 15 days upon an accommodation stamp lacking relevance and foundation) and refused to continue to allow me an ADA advocate)

    When that judge refused to take her own oath of office by stating she "did not have to do that" in my religious beliefs, she made empty the lords name.... because I am a woman who legal changed her name to Faith as a soul choice under such extreme circumstances that I had to endure- Acts of God - storms declared federal disasters destroying our WA home - Elder abuse of my father (military) who later died and his S/O found dead "accidentally swallowing her tongue- husband deemed inoperable cancer (now full remission) and being dragged into forced then volunteer federal witness of ongoing mortgage crime-, that means that my NAME “IS” a symbol of public faith or at least the promise thereof. These courts violated my name and my spiritual beliefs under the 10 commandments - do not take the Lords name in vein - do not steal - and do not bear false testimony. (Real Estate appraisal /broker against a NAR Broker / Advocate/ past NAR Litigation Liaison holding appraisal training in both RBPO and NIAOP (residential and commercial) as a student of contract law whom has reviewed the entire IRS code book whom was a beta tester of their MERS underwriting system whom also was granted privilege to broker "mortgage" to a multitude of sub-prime and wholesale lenders.

    After filing a report to the courts outlining compliance irregularity's and requests for ADA protection as opposing council engaged in heated arguments before the judge against me. I was forced by misuse of sheriff's force by unknown assailants which caused me to abandon the estate to preserve the safety of my family. Though my body suffered bruising from head to toe I was unable to attend the hearing and did not receive any notification of objections. I was denied court call to defend the motion to vacate which outlined the Head Justice at these courts specific transaction engaging in third party graft benefits in exchange for judicial favors. Including but not limited to the witness whom fabricated evidence obtaining the property as an REO listing in exchange for fraudulent testimony. Whom in turn used the sheriff like a tool in knowing I was assaulted off my property to take illegal possession. The Sherriff has a duty to uphold the law, and intentionally or as a result, he breached the peace.

    1) Law Enforcement Code of Ethics specifically states “As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice…… I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service.”
    H.R.2802 .

    2) The Honorable Irma Pool Ashberry has violated my religious beliefs by the denouncing of her oaths under 28 U.S. Code § 453 – “So help me God.” These courts have made empty the very name under which Defendant name stands.

    The State ruling violates Defendants name Faith and SPIRITUAL FAITH. H.R.2802 - First Amendment Defense Act - Prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction - not to mention that holding this knowledge was an incredible burden to bear because in my knowledge I actually know how to take down this “system” which could create economic melt down- endured forced Moral Turpitude which is one heck of an ANTI-SLAPP law suit against the league of Charters.

    HSBC is engaged in Civil Racketeering - third party graft bribes in exchange for judicial favors - on top of tax avoidance at the expense of the American People and is acting in blatant retaliation of a federal witness of ongoing mortgage crimes in the inland empire. These Ultra Vires Acts are the definition of Treason.

    Respectfully Posted via public notice by Faith Lynn Brashear



    PUBLIC/LEGAL NOTICE of DEFECTIVE TITLE


    FAITH LYNN BRASHEAR
    1106 West 56th Street
    Los Angeles CA 90037

    Notice of Defective Title. Reference is made to that certain deed made by Faith Lynn Brashear as Grantor to Countrywide Bank FSB c/o HSBC as trustee, in favor of The Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-OA4 as Beneficiary, (Recording Date: 5/14/2007 as Instrument No as Docket No. 2007-0319880 Dated: 5/2/2007) in official records of Riverside County, California, for the following described real property situated in Riverside County, California, described as APN: 116-290-047 the .84 ACRES, M/L In LOT 47 Mb 365/084 Tr 29617 commonly known as 1095 LOWRY RANCH ROAD, CORONA, Ca, 92881,

    The undersigned hereby certifies legal and factual proof of DEFECTIVE TITLE evidenced by the following fraudulent, forged and recorded documents by unknown third parties in each of the following recorded documents:

    Any questions regarding this matter should be direct to Faith Lynn Brashear, a direct source federal witness of mortgage crimes in the Inland Empire.

    The following perpetrators (Incidental Beneficiaries) pretended to represent the Lender of Record/Creditor named herein the “Deed of Trust” The Security Contract Signed off between Trustor Faith Lynn Brashear FKA Donna Marie Beltz and Countrywide Bank FSB, the originator for The Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-OA4 (Recording Date: 5/14/2007 as Instrument No as Docket No. 2007-0319880 Dated: 5/2/2007) through whom HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for the Holders of The Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-OA4 engaged in the Defalcation of the trust and enacted a non-judicial foreclosure as the original undisclosed holder in due course without a majority action affidavit required BY LAW under 2941.9(d) PRIOR to the issuance of a NOD or NTS as the first sentence in 2924 specifically states that anything OTHER THAN A TRUST is considered a mortgage under CALIFORNA STATE LAW.

    March 2007 Countrywide Bank FSB changed primary regulatory agency from COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY to OFFICE OF TTHRIFT SUPERVISION. THERE IS NO RECORD SHOWING COUNTRYWIDE BANK FSB “COMPLIED” WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & OVERSIGHT UNDER LENDING LICENSE NUMBER 00351782 notate as Countrywide Home Loans /affiliate licenses under Countrywide DBA's or under its foreign stock C0568549.

    NO LENDING LICENSE CAN BE FOUND UNDER COUNTRYWIDE BANK FSB IN EITHER CA OR VA in which Countrywide Bank FSB forfeited their banking status in 3/2007. The wholesale Broker Agreement between Countrywide Home Loans Inc, a New York Corporation and Faith Lynn Brashear through which a refinance was allegedly brokered, holds no mention of Countrywide Bank FSB.



    LICENSE STATUS: - NON-EXISTANT - Countrywide Bank FSB "the bank" officially went Inactive as of 4-27-2009. LICENSE TYPE RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LENDER CANNOT BE FOUND- ADDRESS: 1199 NORTH FAIRFAX STREET STE. 500, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314. Countrywide Bank FSB - Moved bank headquarters from Alexandria, CA to Centennial, CO. February 17, 2009, Countrywide Bank, FSB, Centennial, Colorado (“Countrywide” or “Countrywide FSB”), filed an application to convert to a national bank charter to be titled Countrywide Bank, National Association (“BANA-Colorado”), also with its main office in Centennial, Colorado. On the same day, Bank of America, National Association, Charlotte, North Carolina (“BANA”) filed an application to acquire BANA-Colorado by merger. Countrywide Bank FSB has branches in two states, Texas and Virginia, but did not seek to retain those branches following the conversion. Countrywide Bank FSB was never registered with the secretary of state, never licensed to do business in the state of CA, had their banking status revoked in 3/2007 and did not seek to retain their Bank branches. No Corporate Assignment of Deed exists between Countrywide Bank FSB and Bank of America.

    HSBC has failed to comply with contractual terms of the Deed of Trust, failed to prove that The Mortgage LAW Firm was in fact the legal trustee and thus is not in accordance with Civl Code §2924, and failed to show it "perfected title", as on the face of the record, it is an illegal Trustee Sale the same as in
    Dimock v. Emerald Properties (2000) 81 Cal.App. 4th 868 [97 Cal.Rptr.Zd 25 5J which was followed in Lona v. Citibank, NA. (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 89 in finding that tender is not required when the sale is based on legal issues (fraud, illegal trustee), rather than equitable issues. Further a fraudulent Deed of Trust was electronically recorded upon title under DOC#2016-037198beyond the 15 days allotted under 2924 (h)(c) which according to the Supreme Court ruling U.S. FINANCIAL, L.P. as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL MCLITUS, voids this sale. The 1099-A issued by Specialized Loan Servicing (SLS) as the Original Lender who lent Donna Beltz notated the abandonment on 8/11/16 prior to the non-perfected within 15 days under 2924(h)(c) Trustee Deed upon sale. HSBC recorded with a Stamp “This instrument is being recorded as an ACCOMODATION ONLY, with no Representation to its effect upon title” on 8/29/2016.

    The recordation of a Trustee Deed upon Sale Doc# recordation’s was conducted by Service Link Irvine. The only company registered with the Secretary of State was ServiceLink, Inc. whom in fact filed a Certificate of Surrender of Right to Transact Intrastate Business signed off by Christopher F. Azure, President and Chief Executive Officer Filed by the California Secretary of State November 22nd 2013 #3522085. HSBC has committed wire transfer fraud.



    THERE IS NO RECORD THAT COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB. COMPLIED WITH THE CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE AND SINCE THEN THERE IS NO RECORD OF ANY DATED SIGNED MERGER
    Certificate of Merger (Form OBE MERGER-1) Pursuant to the Statutory filing provisions are found in California Corporations Code sections 1113(g), 3203(g), 6019.1, 8019.1, 9640, 12540.1, 15911.14, 16915(b) and 17710.14

    All statutory references are to the California Corporations Code, unless otherwise indicated. Note: If a limited partnership is a party to the merger, signing the Certificate of Merger (Form OBE MERGER-1) constitutes an affirmation under penalty of perjury that the facts stated in the document are true. (Section 15902.08(b).) The Certificate of Merger (Form OBE MERGER-1) may be used for mergers between: (1) limited liability companies only, in which a one or more California limited liability companies are a party to the merger; (2) limited partnerships only, in which one or more California limited partnerships are a party to the merger; or (3) other business entities (i.e., interspecies mergers), in which one or more California corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnerships or partnerships are a party to the merger

    [The term “other business entity” is defined in Sections 174.5, 5063.5, 12242.5, 15911.01(k), 16901(12) and 17710.01(k).]It is recommended that legal counsel be consulted prior to submitting the Certificate of Merger (Form OBE MERGER-1) to ensure that all issues are appropriately addressed. OR SIGNED off by (COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB (ORIGINATOR)) RECORDED a DECLARATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 2924(h); the following recorded instruments was not authorizing within the Statute of Limitations-California-Law pursuant to CCP §337(1), CCP§337(2), Commercial Code §3118(a) - (b) 

    These recorded instruments recorded in the County of Riverside by HSBC for the Property located at 1095 Lowry Ranch Road, Corona CA 92881. Real Property Legal description: The .84 Acres M/L In Lot 47 Mb 365/084 Tr 29617 occurred after Statute of Limitations-California-Law pursuant to CCP §337(1), CCP§337(2), Commercial Code §3118(a) - (b) 

    In re: Defective Recordings

    WHEREAS, The MERS Member Identification number referenced herein as MIN NO: 1001337-0002108190-9 documents the MERS member 1001337 as Countrywide Bank, FSB and further documents an unidentified pass-through loan number 0002108190 tendering loan number 00016536826405007 as recorded on DOC # 2007-0319880. Recession was exercised under 2941 sub (b)(1)(A-C) upon discovery of the un-securitized instrument and additional verification of its lack of legality upon inception.

    WHEREAS, The nunc pro tunc loans acceleration date is clearly outlined in the first HSBC / Recon Trust Notice of Default which identified the loans DUE DATE aka acceleration date as 6/1/2008. Doc 2012-0129568 3/20/12,. U.C.C. - ARTICLE 3 - NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS (2002) § 3-118. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. (a) Except as provided in subsection (e), an action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time must be commenced within six years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated by a trustee in trust, within six years after the accelerated due date. No legal standing to foreclose exists making the recording of a Notice of Trustee Sale, in violation of PENAL CODE SECTIONS 470-483.5

    WHEREAS CC 2923.5 Claim Unavailable if Servicer Rescinds NOD Doc#2014-0188942. Thereby nullifying Doc#2014-0488544.

    WHEREAS, under TILA1635 (f) (3) consummation never took place thereby extinguishing the seven-year ACKNOWLEGED AS rescinded in 2009 instrument by OPERATION OF FEDERAL LAW. Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc 729 F. 3d 1092 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, 2013 LAW OF THE LAND RULING. Matter of State Law. 12 C.F.R. pt. 226,. 2(a)(13).

    WHEREAS Bank of America prepared an assignment of Deed with a known robo signer acting on behalf of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. recorded DOC#2011-0411709 with “all beneficial interests” and NO “for value consideration” as the loan was not attached ie no value. A legal beneficiary would have transferred an abandoned Deed the security trust, however this transfer evidences a transfer to Bank of America the “servicer” with “ALL beneficiary interest” thereby transferring to Bank of America prepared by Bank of America naming themselves as the new Beneficiary under a regular Deed of Trust transfer with no “For Valuable Consideration”. Bank of America, the “servicer” altered a Corporation Assignment of Deed of Trust/Mortgage and recorded a Corporation Deed Transfer to HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for the “Holders” of the Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc Mortgage Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-though Certificates Series 2007-OA4. Doc# 2012-0129567. A “Holder” is not a “Trust”. No “Actual” transfer into above trust exists. It is not only beyond the 90 day pooling and servicing agreements of a legitimate security trust to be able to do so, said was terminated/suspended swapped out in 2008 rendering it nunc pro tunc, extinguished null and void to the point where it can no longer be placed into the trust extinguishing all beneficiary interests to the trust. Cheung v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 987 F. Supp. 2d 972 (N.D. Cal. 2013). Further Said Trust was utilized for the purpose of issuing pass through certificates attached to the manipulated LIBOR Index evidenced at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm on the trusts recorded prospectus. “Contains 2007-0A4 enter”. Therefor said trust became the property of unknown “holders” having non-claimable beneficiary “desires of interest”. These recorded Documents evidencing these events, renders any sale action against this property void therefore tender is no longer required. Aniel v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 550 F. App’x 416 (9th Cir. 2013), Engler v. ReconTrust Co., 2013 WL 6815013 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2013) CC § 2934a(a)(1)

    Making ALL NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND ELECTION TO SELL UNDER DEED OF TRUST issued through the MERS "system" assigned Debt Collector AKA The Mortgage Law Firm Blatantly Misrepresenting a fiduciary relationship with disclosed lender/creditor (COUNTRYWIDE BANK FSB whom changed primary regulatory agency from COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY to OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION which means that COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB COULD NOT ACT IN THE CAPACITY OF A BANK LENDER ON 5/2/2007. TURNING DOC #2007-0319880 CONTRACT INTO FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT AND FRAUD IN FACTUM.


    Compare the Verbiage between Defendants Ex. A pg3 -DOC#
    2012-0129568 – Notice of Default NOTE: verbiage “will become due on 6/1/2037 as a result of the maturity of the obligation.” to Defendants Ex C pg3 2014 NOD DOC# 2014-0488544 – Notice of Default removing the aforementioned verbiage “will become due on 6/1/2037” and replacing the amount with $660,602 as a 12-month INSTALLMENT loan that became due on Sunday June 1st 2008.

    Now Compare Ex. G 2009 TILA rescission and forensic audit which states
    “The ‘Finance Charge” and “The Total of Payments” are deceptively and fraudulently understated by $662,502.47”. The 2014 NOD, Ex C DOC# 2014-0488544 – Notice of Default replacing the amount with $660,602 as an INSTALLMENT loan that became due on June 1st 2008. This is 98.99% accuracy prediction of the 2009 undisclosed interest charges compared to the installment loan notated upon the Notice of Default. Under REG X – RESPA this was derived utilizing the disclosed amortization tables associated with these loans and comparing it to the projected interest rates being reflected upon the payment coupons. It is enough to establish probable cause that triggering devises and timing machoism’s existed upon these contracts.

    Furthermore, Certificate Holders were told that their investments would be secured by deeds of trust.
    In actuality, the trust deeds were fraudulent because they held toxic tort violations and conflicts of state and federal law, therefore, did not secure the investments. Certificate holders only hold undivided interest in regular interest payments as further outlined in the SEC filings of the 8k report holding Kennedy Clauses specifically preventing certificate holders from being Holders in Due course.

    Federal Rule Of Evidence 803(10) As Amended December 1, 2013 strike out indicates deletion. Compare Doc#2011- 0411709 - First
    “Assignment of Deed of Trust”. to Doc#2012-0129567 – Second “CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF DEED OF TRUST/ MORTGAGE” , Ex E Note that no Corporation Assignment of Deed of Trust exists from Countrywide, the word mortgage is struck, and the no direct transfer into the actual trust exists, only a transfer to HSBC.

    Both the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, signed by President Bush, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, signed by President Obama, instituted a 50% bonus depreciation allowance. Later, the Tax Relief, Unemployment Compensation Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 further increased the allowance to 100% – such that the asset would be fully depreciated in the year of acquisition. This meant that that the lending industry was allowed to buy a worthless sub prime loans and get a 100 percent tax credit by cancelling it, Day one under 26 US Code Section 61 (a) (1) Cancellation of debt and conversion to income paid on a tax payer form 1099.
    See USA v Deutsche Bank AG et al in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 11-02976. The $202.3 million resolves damages and penalties under the False Claims Act.

    A 1099-A is issued for NON-ORDINARY consideration under US 26 section 61 (a) (1) and sec 108 (i) paid post sale – it is not one in the same with interest earned by a lender and paid by a debtor. These issues fall under section 1.1031 where the banks are swapping out depreciation write offs under an alleged partnership interests or "interests on like property exchanges." This miscues the intent under Kirby vs US Lumber to the point where the consumer suffers economic loss as NO MORTGAGE was ever recorded against the property. Only an undisclosed Corporate ENTITY BORROWER (designated by all caps) covenanting that the consumer borrower was lawfully seised from a free and clear property and that this use of the property was irrevocably granted into TRUST. Deeds of conveyance for use of property to which a entitly BORROWS money OVER the consumer by use of their signature is called a Warranty deed of conveyance. Warranty Deeds create Abstracts which cannot be perfected, they are by grant or treaty which VIOLATES Congressional intent. See WINEMAN v. GASTRELL 53 F. 697 Dec 12, 1892.

    Making ANY ruling at a UD Court VOID per operation of law.

    Declaration of Faith Lynn Brashear

    Initial Federal Complaint "JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DEBTOR COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. Sec 1983 FALSE CLAIMS 31 U.S. Code § 3729 (a) (C), violations of US Constitutional Amendments, 5th, 8th 9th and 14th. Adversary Trial for Summary Judgment, Declaratory and Injunctive relief.” Requesting Preliminary Injunction and OSC re (Rule 65(b)(1)(A)&(B) Rule 65(d)et seq; in re: U.S.C., Title 15, §79r(f) and §2924.12); (CCP §525-529; §2924.12); 2. CANCELLATION and EXPUNGEMENT of Void Instruments on Plaintiff’s Land Record as CLOUDs on Title;

    I, Faith Lynn Brashear was DENIED DECLARATORY RELIEF (Judicial determination that the “Assignments of Deed of Trusts” are Void Instruments) In re: Jesinoski and Yvanova Supreme court rulings. 4. DECLARATORY RELIEF Judicial determination that the rulings at Superior Court are VOID ab initio re: Misconduct. CCP Section 52.1 – Witness Tampering. 5. Rescission under Truth in Lending Act; Damages for Statutory Violations in re: Civil Code Sections: 2923.55, 2923.7, 2924.9, 2924.10, and 2924.17.6.Compliance under Truth in Lending Act, et al. 130 [15 U.S.C., 1640], and 26 U.S.

    I am a federal informant who re-asserted her 2009 volunteer witness status which makes it difficult to debunk ANY volunteer work so therefore these actions now fall under 18 U.S. Code § 1512 –REPEATEDLY Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. HSBC brought forth a law suit under a terminated REMIC which held Countrywide (past employeer) Wells Fargo (past beta tester for the UD underwriting system) and Bank of America - successor of servicing rights of MORTGAGES ONLY.

    I am also considered disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act. This makes HSBC in violation of

    #1) Title 42 of the United States Code is the United States Code dealing with public health, social welfare, and civil rights.
    42 U.S. Code § 12202 - State immunity

    A State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the United States from an action in [1] Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a violation of this chapter. In any action against a State for a violation of the requirements of this chapter, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in an action against any public or private entity other than a State. (Pub. L. 101–336, title V, § 502, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 370 )

    #2) 42 U.S. Code § 12203 - Prohibition against retaliation and coercion
    (a) Retaliation
    No person shall discriminate against any individual because such individual has opposed any act or practice made unlawful by this chapter or because such individual made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this chapter.
    (b) Interference, coercion, or intimidation
    It shall be unlawful to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or enjoyed, or on account of his or her having aided or encouraged any other individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by this chapter.
    (c) Remedies and proceduresThe remedies and procedures available under sections 12117, 12133, and 12188 of this title shall be available to aggrieved persons for violations of subsections (a) and (b), with respect to subchapter I, subchapter II and subchapter III, respectively.(Pub. L. 101–336, title V, § 503, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 370.)

    When the UD judge (the one who set a Jury Trial - where a juror approached my witness and she slapped my witness' testimony - when I exposed their witness was conducting real estate transaction with the head justice vested interest in his CA 700 Real Estate company lost my attorney then re-set the Jury Trail allowed a 7 day summary judgment that I did not officially get until the day after I could respond -14 min days required and moved it above my summary judgement - I was pulled into a summary judgment one day before jury- The same judge whom recognized there were triable issues, whom issued a mistrial and rescheduled the jury trial just ruled no triable issues not contested. Surreal, and yes contested not authenticated, missing lease required under 1166 and Missing Majority Action Affidavit CA Civil Code 2941.9. Failure to perfect under 2924 ((h)(c) beyond 15 days upon an accommodation stamp lacking relevance and foundation) and refused to continue to allow me an ADA advocate)

    When that judge refused to take her own oath of office by stating she "did not have to do that" in my religious beliefs, she made empty the lords name.... because I am a woman who legal changed her name to Faith as a soul choice under such extreme circumstances that I had to endure- Acts of God - storms declared federal disasters destroying our WA home - Elder abuse of my father (military) who later died and his S/O found dead "accidentally swallowing her tongue- husband deemed inoperable cancer (now full remission) and being dragged into forced then volunteer federal witness of ongoing mortgage crime-, that means that my NAME “IS” a symbol of public faith or at least the promise thereof. These courts violated my name and my spiritual beliefs under the 10 commandments - do not take the Lords name in vein - do not steal - and do not bear false testimony. (Real Estate appraisal /broker against a NAR Broker / Advocate/ past NAR Litigation Liaison holding appraisal training in both RBPO and NIAOP (residential and commercial) as a student of contract law whom has reviewed the entire IRS code book whom was a beta tester of their MERS underwriting system whom also was granted privilege to broker "mortgage" to a multitude of sub-prime and wholesale lenders.

    After filing a report to the courts outlining compliance irregularity's and requests for ADA protection as opposing council engaged in heated arguments before the judge against me. I was forced by misuse of sheriff's force by unknown assailants which caused me to abandon the estate to preserve the safety of my family. Though my body suffered bruising from head to toe I was unable to attend the hearing and did not receive any notification of objections. I was denied court call to defend the motion to vacate which outlined the Head Justice at these courts specific transaction engaging in third party graft benefits in exchange for judicial favors. Including but not limited to the witness whom fabricated evidence obtaining the property as an REO listing in exchange for fraudulent testimony. Whom in turn used the sheriff like a tool in knowing I was assaulted off my property to take illegal possession. The Sherriff has a duty to uphold the law, and intentionally or as a result, he breached the peace.

    1) Law Enforcement Code of Ethics specifically states “As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice…… I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service.”
    H.R.2802 .

    2) The Honorable Irma Pool Ashberry has violated my religious beliefs by the denouncing of her oaths under 28 U.S. Code § 453 – “So help me God.” These courts have made empty the very name under which Defendant name stands.

    The State ruling violates Defendants name Faith and SPIRITUAL FAITH. H.R.2802 - First Amendment Defense Act - Prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction - not to mention that holding this knowledge was an incredible burden to bear because in my knowledge I actually know how to take down this “system” which could create economic melt down- endured forced Moral Turpitude which is one heck of an ANTI-SLAPP law suit against the league of Charters.

    HSBC is engaged in Civil Racketeering - third party graft bribes in exchange for judicial favors - on top of tax avoidance at the expense of the American People and is acting in blatant retaliation of a federal witness of ongoing mortgage crimes in the inland empire. These Ultra Vires Acts are the definition of Treason.

    Respectfully Posted via public notice by Faith Lynn Brashear







    Because We the Pro Se did not get the 2011 "Memo"

    Please Provide Executive Order to Deprive Due Process

    DISCUSSION BEFORE CONGRESS - THE SUPREME COURT - THE DOJ DIVISION OF THE AMERICAN FOR DISABILITIES - THE AMIRICAN BAR ASSOCIATION- THE CALIFORNIA STATE COURTS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY - THE FEDERAL COURTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTRY - THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - THE COMMISSION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS.


    It was conveyed to declarant and witnessed as such that the courts were under orders to prevent homeowners from "breaking through "the judicial system.

    QUESTION #1
    Under who's orders from above to deprive homeowners their constitutionally protected due process rights, in turn enabling Civil Racketeering to be filtered through the Head Justice Judge Daniel A Ottolia vested ownership interest in First Team Real Estate in exchange for judicial favors in the form of REO transfers by members of the federalized banking industry where his wife Liz Ottolia hangs her real estate license.

    IN RE: Photos of Faith Lynn Brashear battered and bruised head to toe - video of Faith Lynn Brashear's guide dog September 2017 still limping and must now be retired.

    In RE: specific REO transaction conducted by the Superior Courts Head Justice and two Witness's outlining the fabrication/ spoilage of evidence and false testimony conducted at the Historical Riverside Court specifically transferred to that court from the Moreno Valley Unlawful Detainer courts by the Head Justice Daniel Otellia.

    In RE: Excel list of over 3000 REO properties filtered through First Team Real Estate since 2012 - When the head justice Daniel Otellia filed his California 700 form showing 10% ownership interest in First Team Real Estate listing his wife Liz Otellia as the commission source of his vested interest in said company.


    THIS IS A LIVE TELIVISED DEMAND FOR THE FOLLOWING:

    Please provide the executive order which was issued to use whatever means necessary to deprive homeowners their constitutional rights to due process of law in over 30 cities up and down the California Coast including but not limited to 29 DBA’s and 36 franchise offices located in various cities: Anaheim, Arroyo Grande, Bakersfield, Beverly Hills, Big Bear, Cathedral City, Corona, Fullerton, Huntington Beach, Irvine, Ladera Ranch, Laguna Beach, Laguna Niguel, Long Beach, Palm Desert, Oceanside, Marina Del Ray, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, Pasadena, Palm Springs, San Clemente, San Diego, Seal Beach, Sunset Beach, Temecula, Tustin, Yorba Linda, Valencia, and Westlake.

    f211

    Letter to Chiang_Treasurer_Brashear
    EPSON005

    005IRS REVENUE Lack of JURISDICTION, DOA Do Not Consent LTR 2 ATTY .vA1

    - 72-HR DEMAND FOR DOA